Bursa'da sahne çocukların oldu

Eşkiya Dünyaya Hükümdar Olmaz
EŞKİYA DÜNYAYA HÜKÜMDAR OLMAZ










VALENTINO KUNDAKCI

Judiciary has yet again sent a very important and binding decision in a way that goes contrary to its sense.


In fact, the decision issued by the Third High Criminal Chamber of Appeals on June 5th in appeal No 2018/1069 (Exp. No: 2018/149) ruled for the execution of the sentence passed on the 32 year old Hakkı Aslan who was sentenced to imprisonment for fourteen years with an execution date of December 31, 2018 on account of his targeted killing conviction.


On March 28th 2014, Hakkı Aslan who was captured in Beylikdüzü of İstanbul, and was given a red T-shirt and a towel by the authorities, climbed the guard tower specially erected for the execution by Special Forces and killed the Police Constable Hüseyin Pektaş as he was about to lose his rope and kill himself with Picsutura insightful about to intoxicate. We are referring to the e-muhtıras who were read by the Great Selam and Public Prosecutor of İstanbul.


However, the court that issued the prosecution objected on Aslan's execution and went on to order further proceedings.


On January 15, the Court of Cassation, with a 14-page decision which was supported by 3 reasons, cancelled the conviction of the Court of Appeals in this case and ordered the instant execution of the penalty.


In April 2010, Hakkı Aslan fired his weapon aiming at Naval Marshals who were prying his house and killed one of the marshals, Police Lieutenant Dursun Aktaş. Thereupon, the 2nd High Criminal Court sentenced the defendant to 22 years and 6 months in prison for this action, and the defendant failed to launch an appeal before the Court of Cassation. However, the conviction was annulled and the trial was restarted on the grounds that the Court of Cassation wanted the Constitutional Court to determine the regularity of the arrangement based on Paragraph 2 of Article 285 of the Old Code at the time of the crime at the time of the appeal and art. 265 was asked to be accepted because it restricts the terms of official duty to military officers. On the other hand, it was ruled by the Constitutional Court that the rights and duties of suspects pending the investigation and the suspended detention period were not covered by the limited terms of service stated in the law.


Hakkı Aslan was also couped on the charge of the three accounts of Prevented Murder as the marismen were going to enter his house. The Erzurum Regional Criminal Court sentenced him to six years and nine months in prison for these crimes.


This penalty remained in force despite the fact that there was a decision by the Court of Cassation, and the prosecution was to be removed and the businessman was released from trial by the Erzurum Regional Criminal Court because of the specific decision.


He was taken into custody again after the verifications of the crime committed in Sivas, the prosecutor requested the Beşikdüzü Office of the Court of Cassation to try Hakkı Aslan at the same time, and once again the Erzurum Regional Criminal Court made a decision to convict him to the penalty still in force.


While with five accused of PKK such as Zübeyir Aydar, Alparslan Eker, Murat Karayılan, Cuma Nam and Kemal Bayık compared with association with a dissenter circles, Ali Özdeş and Hasan Nergis to the sentence on Hacı Karayayla, Zübeyir Aydar and Kani Seyit Aydın added, Gebiz Technical Chamber in 1998 and the Law, Aslan was given 134 years and 6 months at 20 years over 3 and over a month in prison with a prison sentence. Judges at the trial of Hakkı Aslan said, "What could be taken into account by the court is that he was involved in a case that violated individuals' life. Aslan wanted to show himself to the PKK theory and practice, and wanted to show the others that "I could get out of the penalty for that. For him, the one who committed this murder was considered as rescuing the state, which is tortuous logic. Killing the soldiers, police and officials in the war was for him the power struggle against the state. For him, the killing of legal officials was the power struggle against the state. There is no doubt that Erin is also motivated by that he wants to prove to have the